<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for dslr.ws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslr.ws/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslr.ws</link>
	<description>Digital SLR Camera News, Reviews, and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:42:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 450D (Digital Rebel XSi) Review at DPReview by Admin</title>
		<link>http://dslr.ws/canon-450d-digital-rebel-xsi-review-at-dpreview/comment-page-1/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslr.ws/canon-450d-digital-rebel-xsi-review-at-dpreview/#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s interesting comment spam.  Based on your username and the spammy web site you tried to link to, I guess you&#039;re trying to suggest that it uses the Canon BP-511 battery, and your site would helpfully redirect people to a place where they could give you money for them.  Of course, if anyone had read the post, they would see that it uses the Canon LP-E5 battery instead.  I guess you just searched for BP-511 to find places to spam.

Is the idea to get your link near a question about the battery, in the hopes that Google will think the link is someone answering the question, and therefore an authoritative link?  You know how nofollow works, right?  Or just hoping to get stray search results and clicks?

Anyway, link deleted.  Weird stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s interesting comment spam.  Based on your username and the spammy web site you tried to link to, I guess you&#8217;re trying to suggest that it uses the Canon BP-511 battery, and your site would helpfully redirect people to a place where they could give you money for them.  Of course, if anyone had read the post, they would see that it uses the Canon LP-E5 battery instead.  I guess you just searched for BP-511 to find places to spam.</p>
<p>Is the idea to get your link near a question about the battery, in the hopes that Google will think the link is someone answering the question, and therefore an authoritative link?  You know how nofollow works, right?  Or just hoping to get stray search results and clicks?</p>
<p>Anyway, link deleted.  Weird stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 450D (Digital Rebel XSi) Review at DPReview by bp-511</title>
		<link>http://dslr.ws/canon-450d-digital-rebel-xsi-review-at-dpreview/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>bp-511</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslr.ws/canon-450d-digital-rebel-xsi-review-at-dpreview/#comment-998</guid>
		<description>What battery this dslor use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What battery this dslor use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon Digital Rebel XTs (450D) Rumors by Admin</title>
		<link>http://dslr.ws/canon-digital-rebel-xts-450d-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslr.ws/canon-digital-rebel-xts-450d-rumors/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jason.  These Internet rumors, you can never trust them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jason.  These Internet rumors, you can never trust them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon Digital Rebel XTs (450D) Rumors by Jason</title>
		<link>http://dslr.ws/canon-digital-rebel-xts-450d-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslr.ws/canon-digital-rebel-xts-450d-rumors/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Not 802.11 wireless, but wireless master for flash control</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not 802.11 wireless, but wireless master for flash control</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Review at SLRgear.com by dslr.ws: Digital SLR Camera News, Reviews, and Information &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Review at The Digital Picture</title>
		<link>http://dslr.ws/canon-ef-s-18-55mm-f35-56-is-review-at-slrgearcom/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>dslr.ws: Digital SLR Camera News, Reviews, and Information &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Review at The Digital Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslr.ws/canon-ef-s-18-55mm-f35-56-is-review-at-slrgearcom/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>[...] aren&#8217;t as common as actual camera reviews, so I&#8217;m always glad to find some. There was a Canon EF-S 18-55mm IS review that I talked about a few weeks ago, and now there&#8217;s a new one. This review was posted at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aren&#8217;t as common as actual camera reviews, so I&#8217;m always glad to find some. There was a Canon EF-S 18-55mm IS review that I talked about a few weeks ago, and now there&#8217;s a new one. This review was posted at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Canon EOS-1D Mark III Autofocus Issue by dslr.ws: Digital SLR Camera News, Reviews, and Information &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon EOS 1D Mark III Recall for Auto Focus Issue</title>
		<link>http://dslr.ws/the-canon-eos-1d-mark-iii-autofocus-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>dslr.ws: Digital SLR Camera News, Reviews, and Information &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canon EOS 1D Mark III Recall for Auto Focus Issue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslr.ws/the-canon-eos-1d-mark-iii-autofocus-issue/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>[...] ago &#8212; which claims fixes in the autofocus system &#8212; may not have fully addressed the 1D Mark III auto focus issues that had been reported a while back. There&#8217;s no guarantee that this recall is related to that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ago &#8212; which claims fixes in the autofocus system &#8212; may not have fully addressed the 1D Mark III auto focus issues that had been reported a while back. There&#8217;s no guarantee that this recall is related to that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Olympus E-P1 Rumored by Jay</title>
		<link>http://dslr.ws/olympus-e-p1-rumored/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslr.ws/olympus-e-p1-rumored/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a whole crapload of stuff on the olympus e-p1 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photographybay.com/2007/06/28/olympus-e-p1-leaked-info/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a whole crapload of stuff on the olympus e-p1 <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2007/06/28/olympus-e-p1-leaked-info/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

